I completely agree: the poster section was awful for both presenters and the audience.
For the audience:
You’re have thousands abstracts across multiple topics (genetics, AI, drug discovery, etc.). You have to open the app, scroll through all the abstracts, and find the ones you want to see. Then you schedule a time, go there, and listen to a 4-minute talk through headphones. Questions? You can ask them later. Suggestions? What is this?
In this format, you’ll never have an unexpected discovery, because you must target specific abstracts. Even if you read all of them, there’s no way for your figures or poster to visually attract people.
For presenters, it’s even worse:
First, never trust machines: they can smell fear, and they like it. @waldoe was presenting when someone tried to pair the phone with the screen, and her plot disappeared behind a pairing message (she brilliantly asked the audience to imagine the plot).
Second, there’s no way to engage random people. During traditional sessions, you can kidnap passersby and talk. This virtual format killed the spontaneous networking. Forget about chats about methodology, the small talk with your neighboring presenter, or the surprise of realizing the person you’re talking to is a legend in the field.
If poster sessions are going to stay this way, they might as well just ask people to record short videos and create another video challenge: Abstract Video Challenge.
The coffee break was just coffee (the break was not included), and the poster area felt like 10 screens of people doing ASMR into microphones, while others scanned QR codes to listen. I will not mention the bizarre experience of two people presenting related topics simultaneously.
I hope they bring the traditional poster section